![]() The OmegaT Project always welcomes developers, localisers and users to contribute their experience, knowledge and insights to the software we release. Revision 1.23 / ( download) - annotate -, Sat Dec 28 23:22:19 2019 UTC (3 years, 3 months ago) by ryoon The Belarusian, Czech, Dutch, Italian, Russian, Turkish, and Ukranian localisations were updated. In the Glossary pane, tooltips on glossary entries reveal the files they originated from. You can now specify the server to connect to in the Apertium MT connector. The Windows version has fixes for the installer. The Mac distribution has fixes for macOS 10.15 "Catalina". OmegaT 5.1.0 brings the Mac and Windows packaging fixes from 4.3.1, plus 2 enhancements. ![]() The OmegaT Project always welcomes developers, localizers and users to contribute their experience, knowledge and insights to the software we release. The Brazilian Portuguese, Dutch, French, Italian, Simplified Chinese, and Turkmen localizations were updated. Matching accuracy for tags in level-2 TMXs is improved.īugs in the following features were fixed: It is also included in the exported level-2 TMX. The TMX 'tuid' attribute is now supported as a segment ID for matching purposes. OmegaT 5.2.0 brings 3 enhancements, 6 bug fixes, and 7 localization updates vs 5.1.0. Revision 1.24 / ( download) - annotate -, Fri Apr 17 11:05:44 2020 UTC (3 years ago) by ryoon If you like presenting the keywords on reports as a comma-separated list (as you're currently storing them), you can write a simple function to do the concatenation for you at the presentation layer of your reports (concatenation functions for that purpose are a frequent Access question here on Stackoverflow).CVS log for pkgsrc/editors/OmegaT/Makefile CVS log for pkgsrc/editors/OmegaT/Makefile You could then use a subform with a dropdown list to populate each row of the join table. This "joins" the two, and would then give you a list. You really should use a proper many-to-many structure, with an additional table between the one where you're currently storing the keyword memo and your keyword list table. What if you have 100s of thousands of records and you want to search this field with LIKE "*Keyword*" - will it bog down to be terribly slow (no indexes, and not used well even if there were)? ![]() What if you want the keywords to be sorted in alphabeticsal order? This is a denormalized way to store the data, and this leads to problems: Now, all that said, I'd completely recommend against doing this. and you'd want to add the requery to the OnCurrent event of your form, as well (so that when you arrive on a record, the combo box already omits any keywords that are already in the list). ![]() at the end of the AfterUpdate code above (inside the End If): Private Sub cmbChooseKeyword_AfterUpdate() WHERE InStr(Forms!MyForm!txtKeywordMemo, tblKeywords.Keyword) = 0 You'd also want the rowsource of your combo box to not list items that are already entered, so this is one way that would work for a relatively short list of keywords: SELECT tblKeywords.* Me!txtKeywordMemo = (Me!txtKeywordMemo + ", ") & Me!cmbChooseKeyword Something like this: Private Sub cmbChooseKeyword_AfterUpdate() It would be complicated to do it with a single control, but with two controls, a dropdown list for choosing the value to add, and a textbox displaying the memo field, you could have the combo box's AfterUpdate event append a comma and the chosen value to the existing data.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |